When I was ten years old I had a friend named Max. Max had a sister. She was older — way older, like 10 or 12 years older — than Max and I. She attended college out-of-state out east and had a rabbit for a pet. And I was absolutely head over heels in love with her. I obsessed about her for at least a year, which is a long time for a 10 year old.
Now, nearly 40 years later, whenever someone mentions having a rabbit for a pet, I am filled with this warmth, this joy. The same joy and warmth that I felt when I thought about Max’s sister, whose name I do not remember, when I was 10 years old, imagining us both older, living together out east, and in love. I picture her at her parent’s kitchen table, home for the holidays, saying hello, and I am transported back to those wonderful feelings a first crush bring.
This crush and its connection to rabbits came up in conversation a few months ago and that’s when I realized something: the two connected me to my childhood in one very clean line. A single thread that has run through my entire life since I was 10. Over the years my timeline has been demolished by death and divorce and change — to the point where sometimes it felt like I had lived four or five different lives. There is a quote in Rachel Cusk’s divorce memoir, Aftermath, that hit home for me: “I want to ask her if it feels like real life yet,” she writes after witnessing a friend getting remarried after her own divorce. “Whether the feeling of aftermath can encompass even events whose nature it is the consequence.”
After all of my timeline disruptions it would take so long for life to feel like real life again. And even now when everything in my life feels settled, I still feel like my past is more than just a foreign country, that it belongs to someone else entirely. But then I think of the rabbit, and Max’s sister, and I realize that it’s just been me all along.
The rabbit, Max’s sister. And up until this past weekend, Stuart Broad.
**
I first fell for cricket in April of 2007. Broad had made his ODI debut the previous December, and then made his Test debut the following December. And so he has been there since the beginning. But, now, not anymore. Just like all the rest of the cricketers who had been there at the beginning but have now ridden into the sunset.
The last 16 years have been tumultuous ones in my life; change after change after change. But through it all, Broad has been there, connecting the dots. I would turn on England in a new home in a new life and there he would be, just like he had been in the old home, in the old life.
It was comforting. It was something stable in an unstable world. It’s something that cricket provides that other sports just can’t. Yes, cricket in so many ways is night and day different than it was in 2007, but Test cricket for all intents and purposes looks and feels and sounds pretty much the same. You turn on an England test in 2007, 2011, 2019, 2023, and if you squint, it’s the same game, the same sounds, and there would be Stuart Broad.
In 2007 I was 31 years old. I was married. I lived in a house in suburban Minneapolis. I had a dog. I worked in sales. It was a different, unrecognizable life. Today I live in the city. With my partner, Liz, and our 20 month old son, Louie. It’s tough to marry (for lack of a better word) those two worlds, those two lives, together. But thanks to cricket, it was easier, knowing that Stuart Broad was always out there, blond hair under blue skies, His long loping strides, his handsome schoolboy looks. It’s weird to say there was comfort in that, but there was.
But not anymore.
Now all the players that I bonded with in 2007 are gone. And with them a connection to a life before my divorce, a band-aid on my timeline. And that’s what I thought about this weekend reading through the obituaries on his career: gone is something from my old life. And in that way it made me feel a not overwhelming but very real sense of melancholy. Like, when you learn that a house that your grandparents lived in had been torn down. Or an old co-worker who you half-knew and kind of liked had passed away. Gone was a connection to an old life.
And maybe that’s true for everyone who has followed cricket for the last 16 years. Broad was always there, and there was a comfort in that. The world has changed so much. But Broad has always been there. Like so many other things, it was a comfort that we probably didn’t even recognize until it was gone.
**
England’s Test team on Broad’s debut reads like an old newspaper clipping, the kind you find in a desk drawer a decade later and wonder why you saved it, but are glad you did:
Cook, Vaughn, Bell, Petersen, Collingwood, Bopara, Prior, Broad, Sidebottom, Harmison, Panesar.
Each of those names tells a story. Not just of the game overall but of my love for the game, for Test cricket. These were the players that guided me through those first few years when everything in cricket felt new and even surreal but also somehow perfect. And there at number seven is Stuart Broad, and he fit so snugly into that role, of navigator for me and Test cricket. Barbie, they called him. Sure, Jimmy Anderson was already on the scene, and is still remarkably out there, taking wickets, but Broad making his debut right as I made mine made it feel like were starting the adventure together. He was instantly likable, just like cricket. In 2007 the world felt like it was opening up to me in a brand new way. And Broad was part of that.
It rained in Colombo over those five days. Broad took a wicket but that’s really it. Life went on. 16 years later he was still there. Everything has changed. But he was still there. I read through some emails from that time and they all felt so sad and I don’t know why. It was life and it was fine but I don’t think I was all that happy. It’s tough to remember. I once wrote “I remember being happy, and so I was happy,” but in reading through those emails and thinking about that time, I don’t think I was happy. In fact, I am pretty sure I wasn’t.
Today I am happy. The happiest I have been since I was nine years old. And Stuart Broad was a bridge between those two worlds. 2007, and 2023. Between happiness and unhappiness.
**
Athletes exist in some ways beyond age, beyond time, because they all wow us when they are so young, and are considered over the hill when they are not even close to being old, when they are still very much young. Broad, also, was not a superstar. He was a wonderful bowler, and a joy to watch, but his stats don’t make the jaw drop. Except when they do: he bowled a shocking 34,000 Test deliveries and snatched up a equally shocking 604 Test wickets. How? Because he was always out there. You turned on England and there he was.
As Jarrod Kimber pointed out in his newsletter tonight, Broad’s gift was taking wickets in bunches. Turning series and matches on their head with three, four, five wickets at a time. “His best days are an orgy of wickets,” wrote Kimber. And that I think is why he stood out for me. Because I didn’t get to watch that much cricket, but when I did, Broad was out there, and when Broad was out there, anything was possible.
I guess what I am trying to say is that like so many members of that England team above, Broad is, for me, cricket. He is — or was — what I love — or loved — about cricket. And since he was there at the beginning, where it all started, his orgies of wickets have become what I look for in Test matches, what I compare other bowlers against. Just like Cook and his handful of legendary opening knocks, Prior and his grit, Petersen and his flair. I read through those names and they are my introduction to Test cricket. And what a gift Test cricket has been. And now they are all gone.
Stuart Broad retiring isn’t a coming of age moment. It’s not the death of my childhood. He was not my hero when I was nine years old. But as an adult I stumbled on an old game, and that game followed me through 16 years of, well, life, and all that comes with it. He marked time, but he also stood the test of it. Always, it seemed, young; and always out there, running in, taking wickets in bunches, batting in the English twilight. Everything changes, and then changes again, and there through it all was Test cricket, and the bowler who introduced me to it, and made me love it.
**
When players of note from that era — 2007-08 — retire, I feel a real sense of loss, and change. I lean back and my chair and let the sad thought wash over me: I will never see them play again. Yes, there’s Jimmy Anderson, but Broad felt like the last one. Like, now, they’re all gone. Not just the England players, but players from all over the world. They’re all gone now. And maybe, I don’t know, that’s okay. As I said above: now I am happy. Happiness is not a goal, it’s the by-product of a journey. And these players and this game have seen me through this journey, and now I can set them aside, and move on. And maybe — and this is the sliver lining — see the game in a whole new light. Less of a game with which to mark time, and more like, maybe, just a game, a game that every day finds a new way to entertain.
But I still just can’t believe I’ll never see Stuart Broad bowl again. I will miss him. Just like I miss all the old greats from the year I found cricket and everything changed and brought me here, to this place where I finally feel settled, at peace, at home.
You were a joy, Stuart. Thanks for 16 years.